Some Biggest Myths about Multi-Cloud

The IT industry is currently in a state of great confusion when it comes to multi-cloud. Against pushback from cloud service providers. Who tried to monopolize the industry, most large organizations are now willfully pursuing multi-cloud approaches. The companies is quickly changing from a single cloud architecture to multiple clouds which provides balanced workload. But while this shows a dramatic shift in organization’s infrastructure. And is certainly not without it’s management challenges, many companies are finding that the benefits far outweigh the concerns.

Multi-cloud is no longer a strategy, it’s the reality. In a recent report, 93% of companies respondents reported having multi cloud strategies. Now what you need is a clearer understanding of what multi-cloud structure entail and how they can best be leveraged for emerging workloads. Cloud native has set the standard for companies, but the IT industry is still in a state of confusion when it comes to multi cloud architecture. So here, We have listed some common myths of multi cloud.

1. Multi-Cloud Is Less Secure Than Single Cloud

Multi cloud take the concept of shared responsibility for security to new levels, most secure platforms are already incorporating this element in their latest releases. The compliance and security of your organization rely on first and foremost on it’s management. Multi cloud can actually help to increase compliance and security. View the transition to a multi cloud as an opportunity to take security tools and processes to next level.

New permitting choices are making it simpler for the companies to meet both application and information layer security necessities. While devoted connections going through a protected cloud total entry permits network security conventions to be authorized across the full cloud environment. This can reduce the risk of widespread resource loss or application downtime as failures will be more isolated. Multi cloud can also help you comply with various regional ruling.

2. Multi cloud and hybrid-cloud are Equal

Multi-clouds is made up of clouds hosted by various providers. While hybrid-clouds is combination of public and private clouds. This is an important differentiation as it can highly affects the ways in which the companies can allocate workloads across the appropriate resources. Hybrid-cloud is a subset of multi-cloud. This means that, all hybrid clouds are multi-cloud, but not all multi-clouds are hybrid clouds. When cloud is privately hosted, we can say multi cloud architecture as hybrid cloud.

3. Data Management is Complicated in Multi-Cloud

 Multi cloud structure can be managed through a single interface which make it easy to use. Many companies are using NAS(network-attached storage) to increase the integration of legacy systems to object storage platforms in the cloud. So, Compute resources can access data directly from any sources and perform their operations. And then send data back to storage either in the data center or to the cloud.

4. Multi Clouds are More Expensive

On a per-GB basis, multiple clouds can decrease the cost as the companies has greater leeway to shift loads to the most efficient infrastructure. Companies like Rackspace are offering a wide range of multi-cloud service tools that encourage users to shift workloads to the providers of their choice, even to rivals/partners like Amazon and Microsoft.

5. Multi Cloud Solves Vendor Lock-in

While you can certainly make a container to be portable between clouds, You need to separate you containers from cloud architecture to take benefits of best-of-breed solutions. This means your workloads will not necessarily be readily available to migrate to different clouds. So, You can find yourself breaking the vendor lock-in paradigm by entering multi-cloud. Multi-cloud additionally often require single management platforms, making platform lock-in a possibility. Cloud local is a stage to forestalling lock-in, however the danger is still there.

6. Any companies that has containerized its applications is cloud native by default and neede to prepared for multi-cloud

We can’t disagree with that containers provide applications with standard formats. Which can be run anywhere. However, cloud related applications are quite complex to operate. A responsibility that has been containerized still requires further changes before it very well may be perceived as cloud local. Some of these changes even include adopting container specific operating systems, distributing traffic, and automating building and runtime configurations. Your costs will be very high if you shift monolithic apps from VMs to containers.

7. Multi Cloud is Optional

If one company has ever signed up for a specialized service that suits it’s need, it may have used a cloud provider not used by the rest of other company. This creates shadow IT, means projects managed independently of the IT department. Multi cloud is not necessary when you are not serious about successful business model. Your organization may be inhabiting more clouds than you think. No single cloud provider, not even Amazon can provide optimal service for all data and resources.

8. Multi-Cloud is only for large enterprises

Few companies have been able to avoid shadow IT. So, There are chances that your are data may already be on multiple clouds without your knowledge. This thinking is based on the right assumption that larger organizations have a greater variety of specialized applications. However, smaller businesses also have specialized applications that could benefit from the solutions of different cloud providers. Cloud local applications are adequately lightweight to allow you to pick various providers in any event, when you’re still little. Looking into a multi-cloud architecture will be easier if you adopt different clouds for different needs from the beginning.

9. Multi-cloud is always best with open source

It is true that modern clouds could not exist without open source software. It is also right that open management platform like OpenStack and CloudStack will work with a larger pool of cloud service providers than a proprietary one. But this must take care for the added internal resources and skills that come with open source.

There is no possible way to build and operate at scale, if not supported by open source. However, A combination of both open source and proprietary tools will serve you best. It will not always make sense for your company to invest time and effort innovating, in which case proprietary tools can integrate well into multi-cloud architecture.

10. A multi-cloud architecture requires load-adjusting traffic across various cloud

It is not true that multi cloud involve running the same workload on multiple clouds. In order to take benefits of the best-of-breed solutions offered by various cloud service providers, you require to favour your containers to the cloud structure they will inhabit. Adopting an effective multi-cloud architecture means examining what kinds of applications you have. And deciding which features they will benefit from, and then matching each application to a suitable cloud environment. The result is a infrastructure in which you run different apps and workloads on different clouds, depending on which cloud is best for which aim and need.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *